Dutch Prosecution Challenges Espionage Verdict: 20-Month Sentence Too Lenient in Morocco Spy Case
A 66-year-old former counterterrorism analyst faces renewed legal scrutiny after the Public Prosecution Service appealed his espionage conviction. While acquitted of leaking secrets to Morocco, his 20-month sentence for possessing classified documents is deemed too light, raising concerns about national security and government trust.
| Key Data Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Suspect Age | 66 years old |
| Former Role | Analyst at National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) |
| Court Verdict | Convicted of possessing state secrets, acquitted of leaking to Morocco |
| Sentence Imposed | 20 months in prison |
| Prosecution Demand | 12 years in prison |
| Appeal Reason | Evidence for espionage allegedly undervalued; sentence too lenient |
| Documents Involved | Large quantity, found at home and during travel |
| Location of Trial | Rotterdam District Court |
| Case Reference | ECLI:NL:RBROT:2026:2400 |
The Public Prosecution Service (PPS) is responsible for prosecuting criminal offenses in the Netherlands, ensuring justice and upholding national security. In this case, the PPS evaluates the handling of classified information by government employees, a critical aspect of safeguarding state secrets and public trust in institutions.
Openrijk has no cookies or ads
But could use some support
Read the full translated article below
Public Prosecution Service appeals in Morocco espionage case
The Public Prosecution Service (PPS) has appealed the criminal case in which a suspect was accused of espionage on behalf of Morocco. The 66-year-old man had worked for years as an analyst at the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV). The Rotterdam District Court convicted him of possessing state secrets but acquitted him of leaking documents to the Moroccan intelligence service.
The court sentenced the man on March 11, 2026 to 20 months in prison, while the PPS had demanded 12 years. The verdict reflects a difference of opinion regarding the assessment of the evidence. For this reason, the PPS wishes to submit the case to a higher court.
The PPS believes the suspect was wrongly acquitted of transferring state secrets to the Moroccan intelligence service. According to the PPS, the evidence and arguments presented were given insufficient weight. The PPS also considers the imposed sentence for possessing state secrets too lenient, not least because of the enormous quantity of documents, both at home and while traveling. The suspect, who should have known better how to handle state secrets, incorrectly points to permission granted by various NCTV supervisors. During the appeal hearing, the PPS will further elaborate on its positions.