Hot air balloon pilot cleared after fatal accident in Friesland
A tragic hot air balloon accident in Friesland last year resulted in one death and multiple injuries. After a thorough investigation, the Public Prosecution Service has cleared the pilot of any wrongdoing, citing unforeseeable weather conditions as the cause.
| Key Data Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Date of Accident | August 13, 2025 |
| Location | IJkenweg, De Hoeve (Fryslân) |
| Time of Accident | Around 9:00 PM |
| Casualties | 1 fatality, several (seriously) injured |
| Investigation Body | Aviation Police and Public Prosecution Service North Holland (OM) |
| Weather Conditions | Stronger winds than forecasted, but within permitted limits (KNMI) |
| Pilot’s Actions | Aborted earlier landing attempt; careful assessment of landing site |
| Outcome | Case dismissed; no fault attributed to the pilot |
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) is responsible for prosecuting criminal offenses in the Netherlands, including those related to aviation safety. In this case, the OM reviewed the findings of the aviation police to determine whether the pilot bore any criminal liability for the accident.
Openrijk is free and ad-free
Do you value our work? Help us stay online with a small contribution.
Read the full translated article below
Fatal hot air balloon accident in Friesland: pilot not at fault
On August 13, 2025, a hot air balloon accident occurred in which one passenger died and several others were (seriously) injured. The aviation police subsequently launched a criminal investigation, which was reviewed after completion by the national aviation prosecutor of the Public Prosecution Service North Holland (OM). Based on the investigation findings, the OM has decided to dismiss the case against the pilot of the hot air balloon, as no fault can be attributed to him.
Suspicion
The accident took place on August 13 of last year, around 9:00 PM, on the IJkenweg in De Hoeve (Friesland province). During the landing, the wind was strong, causing passengers to fall out of the basket and sustain injuries. One person died as a result. Following the report of the accident, the aviation police launched a criminal investigation. The pilot was suspected, among other things, of being at fault for the balloon accident that resulted in one fatality and several (serious) injuries, operating the balloon in a manner that endangered others, and inadequate flight preparation. This suspicion was partly based on the strong winds during the balloon ride.
Investigation findings
The investigation revealed that during the flight, the wind speed was higher than initially forecasted and could not have been anticipated. The weather forecasts did not indicate a reason to cancel the balloon ride, and other balloon pilots have stated that they took off under similar conditions that day. During the joint briefing, none of them saw a reason to cancel the flights. The weather forecasts issued by the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) remained (well) within the permitted limits throughout the planned flight. Additionally, there is no evidence that the pilot acted carelessly during the execution of the landing. On the contrary, the investigation shows that, under the circumstances, he made a careful assessment regarding the choice of landing site and the execution of the landing. He also aborted an earlier landing attempt when it became clear that, given the wind speed, the field was too small for the balloon at that time. Furthermore, the investigation found that the balloon was airworthy and had sufficient fuel. There is also no indication that the pilot failed in his flight preparation.
No fault
Based on the investigation findings, the OM has concluded that the accident was not due to the pilot's fault but resulted from an unfortunate combination of unforeseeable circumstances. The pilot was, in hindsight and with the knowledge gained from the investigation, wrongly considered a suspect. The OM has since dismissed the case. All parties involved have been informed of this decision.