The priority rules for social rental housing in Amsterdam ensure that the distribution of homes is fairly balanced. All groups of housing seekers have a reasonable chance and vulnerable groups receive extra support. This is evident from research. However, not everyone understands the rules. What were the main findings?
The research was conducted by the municipality, housing corporations, the Federation of Amsterdam Tenants Associations (FAH), and Arcade. It focused on the rules that give people priority for a social rental home via WoningNet.
Housing shortage
Due to the severe shortage of homes, it is difficult for everyone to find a social rental home. Many people think they have no chance without priority. And that almost no homes are assigned to people without priority. That is not true.
Also a home without priority
On average, 45 percent of the homes are offered without exclusive priority. People without priority can also respond to these homes. If no one with the correct priority responds, the home goes to someone without priority. In 2024, 720 housing seekers without any form of priority were assigned a home.
Balanced distribution
The research also shows that the scarce social rental homes are fairly evenly distributed. All groups have a reasonable chance, and people in vulnerable positions receive extra help. The rules basically work well, and no major changes are needed.
Suitability criteria
Especially the rules that ensure a home fits someones income, household size, or disability, the so-called suitability criteria, work well. Almost all family homes went to families.
Possible improvements
However, there are areas for improvement. The research shows that families with children currently have less chance than other groups. We want to explore how we can better help this group. For seniors, there are many different priority rules, giving them relatively more opportunities. This is sensible. When older people move to a smaller home, a larger home becomes available for a family.
Next steps
The biggest challenge is clarity. The number of priority rules is too large, there is overlap, and the rules are often too complicated and unclear. We therefore want to work with corporations and tenant organizations to see if the system can be simplified.
Removing regulations
We will investigate whether overlapping or hard-to-explain regulations can be removed. Sometimes a regulation is redundant because the goal has already been achieved, such as with youth retention. We will also work with corporations to better explain the priority rules. This way, we create a clearer, more understandable system in which every housing seeker in Amsterdam knows what the rules are, how they work, and how to make use of priority.
